Esplanade Road Closure

How malling the Esplanade fails Surfers Paradise

Turning the Esplanade into a pedestrian mall may sound visionary, but it undermines the city’s very foundations. The Esplanade isn’t just a road — it’s the backbone of Surfers Paradise, serving its tallest towers, busiest hotels, and densest neighbourhoods. Closing it divides the city, disrupts access, and damages the economy it was meant to enhance.

It is not just any street. The Esplanade is the defining edge of the city — the line where the tallest towers, densest apartment living, and most sought-after real estate meets the open foreshore.

From the earliest days of high-rise development, the prime towers gravitated to this road because of its unmatched views and direct access to the beach. The result is that the Esplanade became the service spine for the city’s most valuable land and its most concentrated residential population.

A road that built the skyline

Surfers Paradise is unlike any other place in Australia. It is a suburb that looks like a city. Its economy is leisure. The Esplanade is the spine connecting the premium eastern half.

The modern identity of Surfers Paradise was forged in the 1960s and 70s, when developers began to build Australia’s first generation of high-rise towers. The most prized locations had the Esplanade as their front door. The reason was obvious: it offered uninterrupted views eastward over the Pacific, and direct proximity to the beach. From there, the city’s famous vertical skyline expanded block by block, but its foundation remained anchored to the Esplanade.

Surfers Paradise 1976

This wasn’t an accident. In city-building terms, the Esplanade became what urbanist Kevin Lynch would call a primary path — a street that shapes the way the city is experienced, valued and remembered. Once that pattern was set, it locked in circulation flows, density, and economic dependency around this spine. That dependency remains today.

Why malling it undermines the city

This is what makes proposals to “mall” the Esplanade — to extend Cavill Mall across it in the name of creating a “seamless connection to the beach” — so damaging. The visual appeal is undeniable on a sketch. But cities don’t live on sketches. They live on flows of people, goods, and services. And cutting the Esplanade severs the structural artery that those flows depend upon.

The revitalisation plan proposes extending the Cavill Mall onto the Esplanade. Closing the road to traffic. Image from the 2023 concept plan.

Even the Council itself quotes Jane Jacobs: “People make cities, and it is them, not buildings, that we must fit our plans.” Yet Jacobs’ work was never about imposing abstract visions. It was about respecting the patterns of daily life, the organic flows of streets, and the ways people actually use cities. Malling the Esplanade does the opposite. It ignores how residents, workers, and visitors rely on this circulation route every day. It prioritises an aesthetic sketch over lived experience.

From the 2020 Surfers PAradise Place Making Plan

The Esplanade is not simply a boundary between the commercial strip and the beachfront. It is the circulation route that sustains both. Remove it, and you don’t just blur functions — you create a barrier. North and south Surfers are split. Traffic collapses into gridlock. Residents pay with lost time and higher costs. Tourists lose the very ease of movement, chilled out vibe and access they came here to enjoy.

The wrong playbook

Time Square in Manhattan New York is a often quoted as a model to justify closing the Esplanade to traffic. This and the other models quoted share little in common with Surfers Paradise geography, traffic patterns or daily life.

The Council likes to point to overseas precedents such as Strøget in Copenhagen or Times Square in New York as proof that pedestrianisation “works.” But these examples are landlocked. They are not coastal cities where a beachfront boulevard carries the daily circulation load of residents and visitors alike. They operate on a completely different urban model.

The right comparisons are coastal cities like Miami Beach, Honolulu’s Waikīkī, or Rio’s Copacabana — where beachfront boulevards are not closed, but celebrated as essential arteries that sustain tourism, access and local life. These cities understood that their beachfront roads are not expendable; they are the very backbone that makes the coastal economy function.

If anything, the better international comparison is Miami. There, Ocean Drive — one of the world’s most famous beachfront boulevards — trialled a one-way shared street model. It’s mixed success failed after five years and now Miami has restored Ocean Drive to two-way vehicle traffic, after business took the council to court.

In Surfers Paradise, the opposite is being proposed. We were promised Times Square, but what we’ve been given is New York gridlock.

A network reduced to one fragile lane

Just 60 cars is all it takes to fill Orchid Avenue all the way back through Cavill Avenue to the Boulevard. Surfers Paradise has no 8 to 9 or 4 to 6 daily grind "peak hour". Peak times are sunny days, weekends, summer holidays and events – when the marketing has worked. Our peak times are when the tourists arrive.

Urban road networks work best when circulation is spread across multiple routes. Surfers Paradise originally had three north–south arteries:

  • Ferny Avenue (the Gold Coast Highway): a multi-lane corridor carrying through-traffic and regional flow.
  • Surfers Paradise Boulevard: once a broad north–south route through the heart of town.
  • The Esplanade: the eastern spine serving the high-rise beachfront strip.

That balance has already been eroded. The Boulevard is no longer a through-route; it has been reduced to a single southbound lane to accommodate the light rail. The Highway is often at capacity, carrying heavy volumes of traffic passing through Surfers. That leaves Orchid Avenue as the only northbound alternative — a narrow, single lane street that passes through the most densely populated hotel and entertainment precinct in the city.

Police trapped in traffic on Orchid Avenue. The Surfers Paradise Police Station is located in the middle of Orchid Avenue and this one way street is their only exit.

Relying on Orchid Avenue for northbound circulation is not just inefficient, it is dangerous:

  • The police station on Orchid Avenue frequently finds officers trapped in traffic while responding to emergencies, with sirens wailing throughout the day and night.
  • Recently, a tram derailment jammed the city for most of the day, demonstrating how quickly incidents on limited routes can paralyse circulation.
  • During a fire scare at an apartment tower, firefighters had to proceed on foot because their two fire engines were stuck in traffic just half a block away.
  • Just last year, the Hilton Hotel’s rooftop caught fire, again highlighting the challenges emergency services face in a city full of high rise towers with constrained north–south access.
  • This isn’t just about inconvenience — it is about safety. The Council’s own Road Safety Plan (2015–2020) confirms that 50% of serious pedestrian crashes in Surfers Paradise occur at night between 8pm and 6am, and 35% occur specifically on Friday and Saturday nights — night time on the weekends. Orchid Avenue is the premier nightlife strip, crowded with pedestrians now with directly increased risk.
Half of the pedestrian accidents in Surfers Paradise happen at night. Over a third happen on Friday and Saturday nights. Orchid Avenue is the premium night club strip at one time boasting the highest density of night clubs in Australia. Closing the Esplanade to traffic makes it the only north bound route on the Eastern side of Surfers Paradise.

Orchid Avenue and the surrounding network simply cannot safely absorb the traffic displaced from a closed Esplanade. By cutting the Esplanade, Surfers Paradise would be left with a single, fragile north–south corridor for local circulation — a structural failure that threatens public safety as well as daily life.

Father pulls son back from approaching car while attempting to cross the road. Scenes like this are now not uncommon. The Esplanade closure has created dangerous, congested traffic conditions for tourists and locals.

Peak times - in a holiday destination

It has been stated by Council representatives that the traffic problems have been caused by Google Maps sending people the wrong way and that it is only really a problem during "busy times". There are many things wrong with those sentiments. Navigation apps are aware of traffic congestion in real time. If they are the reason, its because it is the quickest or only route. To suggest it is caused by the navigation app seems to imply a lack of insight into how navigation apps and our city works.

Surfers Paradise has no regular office worker peak hour. Our busy times are tourists.

Surfers Paradise has a fundamentally different rythym to any other urban centre. There is no office worker 9 to 5 crush. No daily grind. Our peak times are when there is a sudden rush of visitors and tourists. Like Friday and Saturday nights, Summer holidays, long weekends, a sunny day, an event or when the marketing has worked.

250 cars is all it takes to clog the entire Elkhorn, Orchid, Cavill, Boulevard quadrangle. An awards night at the Hilton could do it. The road network is now designed to fail at the moment our customers arrive.

The principle at stake

The principle is simple: successful pedestrianisation works when it concentrates activity where commerce already thrives — as Cavill Mall does. But when pedestrianisation overrides a structural circulation route, it undermines the very system the city relies on.

Surfers Paradise doesn’t just need revitalisation — it deserves it. But real revitalisation builds on the city’s foundations, not against them. The Esplanade is not just a road to be sketched over; it is the backbone of Surfers Paradise’s urban form, its economy and its daily life. To undermine it is to weaken the city itself.

Malling the Esplanade is not a bold vision. It is a structural failure in the making — a concept that fails the city.

What can you do?

Take our survey

30 questions the Council didn’t ask about the The Surfers Paradise Esplanade Closure Trial

The consultation is open until November 16, 2025. If this matters to you, join us in speaking up now.

Contact your local member

Email John-Paul Langbroek (federal member for Surfers Paradise)

Contact the Council

Email Cr Darren Taylor (Councillor for Division 10)

Stay in touch

Lets keep you informed by email

Click the link below and enter your email in the space provided. We will keep you up-to-date with the latest developments.

Join us!

Become a member of In Surfers Paradise so we can be stronger together.